Elementary and Secondary Education Act
The Coalition for Teaching Quality (CTQ) represents a broad cross-section of over 100 local, state, and national organizations representing civil rights, disability, parent, student, community, and education groups. The Rural School and Community Trust has been a member since the coalition’s founding in 2010.
Date:
June 26, 2016
Related Categories:
Administrator,
Capacity Building,
Collaborations,
Community Advocate,
Elected Official/Staff,
Student,
Teacher,
What's New
Related Tags:
Achievement Gap,
African-American students,
All States,
Civic Engagement,
Community Schools,
Disabilities,
Early Childhood,
Elementary and Secondary Education Act
Critical investments in preschool, K-12 and higher education are among the highlights of the Department of Education's 2016 budget request.
Date:
February 22, 2015
Related Categories:
Administrator,
Capacity Building,
Collaborations,
Community Advocate,
Elected Official/Staff,
Funding/Grants/Scholarships,
Media,
Parent,
Policy Maker,
Student,
Teacher,
What's New
Related Tags:
Achievement Gap,
All States,
College/University,
Disabilities,
Early Childhood,
Elementary and Secondary Education Act,
English Language Learners (ELL),
Federal Education Policy,
Federal Programs,
Income Related Issues,
K-12,
Minority Students,
Poverty,
Pre-K and Kindergarden,
Teacher Issues,
Title I,
Youth
The Administration's Fiscal Year 2014 budget proposal request recommends the elimination of funding for Impact Aid, Section 8002 (Federal Properties) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
Date:
May 09, 2014
Related Categories:
Administrator,
Community Advocate,
Elected Official/Staff,
Funding/Grants/Scholarships,
Media,
Networks/Groups,
Parent,
Student,
Teacher,
What's New
Related Tags:
Community Development,
Elementary and Secondary Education Act,
Facilities,
Federal Policy,
Federal Programs,
Income Related Issues,
Indigenous People,
K-12,
Teacher Issues,
Technology
When the across-the-board federal budget cuts, known as the Sequester, took effect on March 1, 2013, school districts receiving federal Impact Aid experienced an immediate reduction of funds for the 2012-2013 school year, because funding for the Impact Aid Program is used the same school year it is appropriated.
Date:
November 04, 2013
Related Categories:
Administrator,
Community Advocate,
Elected Official/Staff,
Parent,
Policy Maker,
What's New
Related Tags:
Civic Engagement,
Class Size,
Consolidation,
Educational Technology,
Elementary and Secondary Education Act,
Federal Policy,
Federal Programs,
Indigenous People,
K-12,
Poverty,
School/District Size,
Teacher Issues
A new bill would amend the Title I law to require school districts to spend as much on the education of students in high-poverty schools as it does on students in low-poverty schools.
The federal Title I formulas send more funding for poor students to large low-poverty suburban districts than to smaller, higher-poverty rural districts. That’s not right and Congress needs to hear that the formulas should be fixed.
A coalition of civil rights organizations has issued a compelling document outlining new federal strategies to ensure that all students have substantive and fair opportunities to learn. The document’s critique of competitive mechanisms for distributing federal funding and use of unproven school turnaround strategies that harm students and communities is powerful. Equally important are the strategies it outlines to strengthen communities, engage parents in schools in meaningful way, and make states accountable for providing equitable resources and opportunities for all students. Such strategies would take federal policy in new directions to address the challenges and gross inequities facing low-income students and communities…
A recent report for the U.S. Department of Education finds that low-income rural schools made good use of a federal formula grant. The findings are important in the debate over whether federal grants should be awarded primarily on a competitive or formula basis.
Competitive grants are an increasingly important part of federal funding for schools. But will they reach the highest-poverty rural schools or enhance equal educational opportunity.
Districts in richer states that support education get a lot more federal money to improve the education of very low-income students than districts in poor states that provide less funding for schools...
A report evaluating the implementation and outcomes of the federal Comprehensive School Reform program (CSR) from 2002 to 2008 finds that most schools receiving CSR funds did not implement all the program requirements, nor did they make more achievement growth than comparison schools. Although it would seem that extra financial support did not produce desired outcomes, a closer read of the report finds that most schools faced a number impediments to implementation and that addressing these impediments might go a long way toward helping high-poverty low-performing schools achieve at higher levels.
The Rural Trust’s Formula Fairness Campaign has conducted two new analyses of Title I funding that demonstrate how — and why — some districts get less federal support than other districts for each very low-income student. One report shows how districts located in states that spend more on education get more Title I funding. The other report analyzes one option for fixing Title I to make it more equitable for high-poverty school districts, especially those located in rural areas.
John White, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Rural Outreach at the U.S. Department of Education, is inviting rural superintendents and principals to participate in a webinar on the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) and rural schools on
Thursday, May 27, 2010, from 4:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.
In a pointed letter to Congressional leadership, the Children’s Defense Fund makes the case for fixing the Title I funding formulas and changing other aspects of the federal education law…
The unfairness of “Number Weighting,” which shifts Title I funding for poor students from poorer school districts to larger less poor districts, is gaining attention…
Pages: