Last Updated: August 01, 2001
by Craig Howley
This report provides the first detailed picture of the features of the rural school bus ride. Data were provided by rural elementary school principals in Arkansas, Georgia, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Washington: states chosen to represent diversity in region, locale (rural and suburban), and ethnic composition. Schools were selected at random, and response rates varied between 52% and 71%.
Four conclusions define a set of key policy issues related to the rural bus ride:
Longest Rides
A commonly cited standard for one-way length (duration) of school bus rides for elementary children is 30 minutes. In an appalling 85% of these rural elementary schools, respondents reported that longest rides exceed this upper limit. Worse still, in 25% of these rural schools, longest rides reportedly exceed 60 minutes (the suggested standard for high school students). It seems thoughtless that adults would so frequently impose long commutes on some rural children, a reflection underlined by the finding that, in the most impoverished schools, longest rides are substantially longer than in other rural schools. The average commuting time for adult Americans is just 22.4 minutes, and even in Los Angeles, the land of congested freeways, it is only 26.5 minutes. Apparently being rural and poor is sufficient justification, in practice, to impose long rides on some young children.
Compounded Risks
Leading scholars (e.g., Bronfenbrenner, 2000) have reflected on the extraordinary degree of separation from children that modern society and its practices have imposed on families and communities. Challenging features of children's commute to school compound and reinforce this separation. Analyzed in the report, these compounded features of the ride are as follows:
Illustrative results appear in Table 5 for combinations of two to four features simultaneously encountered at a given rural elementary school. The report shows that combinations of these features of the rural bus ride are prevalent among rural elementary schools. Differences between states in this regard, moreover, are sharp and reach very high levels of statistical significance; state of residence itself, then, appears to be a risk factor.
Inequalities on the Ride
Potential risks are compounded by poverty and minority status. Most succinctly, in highest-poverty rural elementary schools as compared to lowest-poverty rural elementary schools:
Similarly, in lowest-minority rural schools as compared to highest-minority rural schools:
These findings indicate that riding the rural school bus is as much a part of inequity in the U.S. as living in a particular neighborhood or holding a particular job. It is as characteristic of educational inequity as unequal school funding, unequal access to fabulous teachers, and differential achievement levels.
Consolidation
As rural schools have consolidated, they have become more centrally located and have enrolled more and more students. As a result, the geographic domain served by them has also expanded. Correlations between longest ride and size of attendance area are substantial. In all likelihood, size of the school attendance area most strongly influences the average length of the bus ride in rural schools. All else equal, it would be logical to speculate that rural school consolidation produces longer average bus rides.(2)
Implications
The finding that poverty is consistently associated with the burdens of the rural bus ride strengthens the logical argument for sustaining and restoring smaller schools in rural areas of the United States. Instead of focusing policy efforts only or principally on mitigating burdensome features of the rural school bus ride, educators and policy makers can more effectively foil the burdens of the ride by ensuring the existence of small rural schools, especially ones that serve impoverished rural communities.